High-Flow Nasal Cannula oxygen therapy in COVID-19: retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes – single center experience

BackgroundHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy emerged as the therapy of choice in COVID-19-related pneumonia and moderate to severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). HFNC oxygen therapy in COVID-19 has been recommended based its use to treat AHRF of other etiologies, and studies...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in medicine 2023-10, Vol.10, p.1244650-1244650
Hauptverfasser: Obradović, Dušanka, Milovančev, Aleksandra, Plećaš Đurić, Aleksandra, Sovilj-Gmizić, Stanislava, Đurović, Vladimir, Šović, Jovica, Đurđević, Miloš, Tubić, Stevan, Bulajić, Jelena, Mišić, Milena, Jojić, Jovana, Pušara, Miroslava, Lazić, Ivana, Đurković, Mladen, Bek Pupovac, Renata, Vulić, Aleksandra, Jozing, Marija
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy emerged as the therapy of choice in COVID-19-related pneumonia and moderate to severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). HFNC oxygen therapy in COVID-19 has been recommended based its use to treat AHRF of other etiologies, and studies on assessing outcomes in COVID-19 patients are highly needed. This study aimed to examine outcomes in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and severe AHRF treated with HFNC. Materials and methodsThe study included 235 COVID-19 patients with pneumonia treated with HFNC. Data extracted from medical records included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, clinical and oxygenation status, clinical complications, as well as the length of hospital stay. Patients were segregated into two groups based on their oxygen therapy needs: HDU group, those who exclusively required HFNC and ICU group, those whose oxygen therapy needed to be escalated at some point of hospital stay. The primary outcome was the need for respiratory support escalation (noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation) and the secondary outcome was the in-hospital all-cause mortality. ResultsThe primary outcome was met in 113 (48%) of patients. The overall mortality was 70%, significantly higher in the ICU group [102 (90.2%) vs. 62 (50.1%), p 
ISSN:2296-858X
2296-858X
DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1244650