Association between serum uric acid‐to‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and insulin resistance in an American population: A population‐based analysis
ABSTRACT Introduction Previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between the serum uric acid‐to‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (UHR) and insulin resistance (IR) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, no existing studies have investigated the relationship between IR...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of diabetes investigation 2024-06, Vol.15 (6), p.762-771 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACT
Introduction
Previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between the serum uric acid‐to‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (UHR) and insulin resistance (IR) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, no existing studies have investigated the relationship between IR and UHR in the general population. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between UHR and IR in the general American population.
Methods
A sample of 8,817 participants was selected from the 2013 to 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR) was used to assess insulin resistance. Multiple logistic regression, generalized smooth curve fitting, and subgroup analysis were used to assess the association between IR and UHR.
Results
Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated a significant correlation between insulin resistance and UHR, with odds ratios (OR) of 1.07 (95% CI = 1.03–1.11) in males and 1.18 (95% CI = 1.13–1.25) in females. A non‐linear relationship and saturation effect between IR risk and UHR were observed, characterized by an inverted L‐shaped curve and a critical inflection point at 8.82. It was found that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of UHR was significantly larger (AUC = 0.703 for males and 0.747 for females, all P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2040-1116 2040-1124 2040-1124 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jdi.14170 |