Establishment and characterization of patient-derived xenografts as paraclinical models for head and neck cancer

We investigated whether head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) reaffirm patient responses to anti-cancer therapeutics. Tumors from HNSCC patients were transplanted into immunodeficient mice and propagated via subsequent implantation. We evaluated established...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC cancer 2020-04, Vol.20 (1), p.316-12, Article 316
Hauptverfasser: Kang, Han Na, Kim, Jae-Hwan, Park, A-Young, Choi, Jae Woo, Lim, Sun Min, Kim, Jinna, Shin, Eun Joo, Hong, Min Hee, Pyo, Kyoung-Ho, Yun, Mi Ran, Kim, Dong Hwi, Lee, Hanna, Yoon, Sun Och, Kim, Da Hee, Park, Young Min, Byeon, Hyung Kwon, Jung, Inkyung, Paik, Soonmyung, Koh, Yoon Woo, Cho, Byoung Chul, Kim, Hye Ryun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We investigated whether head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) reaffirm patient responses to anti-cancer therapeutics. Tumors from HNSCC patients were transplanted into immunodeficient mice and propagated via subsequent implantation. We evaluated established PDXs by histology, genomic profiling, and in vivo anti-cancer efficacy testing to confirm them as the authentic in vivo platform. From 62 HNSCCs, 15 (24%) PDXs were established. The primary cancer types were tongue (8), oropharynx (3), hypopharynx (1), ethmoid sinus cancer (1), supraglottic cancer (1), and parotid gland (1); six PDXs (40%) were established from biopsy specimens from advanced HNSCC. PDXs mostly retained donor characteristics and remained stable across passages. PIK3CA (H1047R), HRAS (G12D), and TP53 mutations (H193R, I195T, R248W, R273H, E298X) and EGFR, CCND1, MYC, and PIK3CA amplifications were identified. Using the acquisition method, biopsy showed a significantly higher engraftment rate when compared with that of surgical resection (100% [6/6] vs. 16.1% [9/56], P 
ISSN:1471-2407
1471-2407
DOI:10.1186/s12885-020-06786-5