Impact of maternal obesity on preterm delivery in patients with cervical cerclageAJOG Global Reports at a Glance

BACKGROUND: Maternal obesity has risen in the United States in recent decades. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal obesity on the risk for spontaneous preterm delivery and the risk for overall preterm delivery among patients with cervical cerclage placement. STUDY DESIGN:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AJOG global reports 2023-05, Vol.3 (2), p.100211
Hauptverfasser: Hoang Yen Nguyen, MD, Bo Park, PhD, MPH, Jordan Rossi, MD, Beverly Tse, MD, Alicia Cryer, DO, Ruofan Yao, MD, MPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: Maternal obesity has risen in the United States in recent decades. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal obesity on the risk for spontaneous preterm delivery and the risk for overall preterm delivery among patients with cervical cerclage placement. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study in which data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development linked birth file from 2007 to 2012 were used, yielding a total of 3654 patients with and 2,804,671 patients without cervical cerclage placement. Exclusion criteria included patients with missing information on body mass index, multiple gestation, anomalous pregnancies, and gestations 42 weeks. Patients in each group were identified and were further categorized based on body mass index with the nonobese group defined as having a body mass index of 40 kg/m2. The risks for overall and spontaneous preterm delivery were compared between patients without obesity and those with obesity or those with morbid obesity patients. The analysis was stratified by cerclage placement. RESULTS: Among patients who underwent cerclage placement, the risk for spontaneous preterm delivery was not significantly different in the obese and morbidly obese group when compared with the nonobese group (24.2% vs 20.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.97–1.43; and 24.5% vs 20.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.12; 0.78–1.62, respectively). However, among patients without cerclage placement, the obese and morbidly obese groups had a higher risk for spontaneous preterm delivery than the nonobese group (5.1% vs 4.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 1.02–1.05; and 5.9% vs 4.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 1.00–1.07, respectively). The risks for overall preterm delivery at
ISSN:2666-5778
2666-5778