Three-dimensional assessment of hallux valgus correction using the Lapicotton technique
Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of the LapiCotton procedure on patients with hallux valgus (HV) combined with medial longitudinal arch collapse. Methods: Preoperative and postoperative weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans were obtained from patients with H...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Foot & Ankle (Online) 2022-12, Vol.16 (3), p.237-241 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of the LapiCotton procedure on patients with hallux valgus (HV) combined with medial longitudinal arch collapse. Methods: Preoperative and postoperative weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans were obtained from patients with HV submitted to the LapiCotton procedure. Semi-automatic measurements were applied to 22 WBCT images across 11 patients enrolled in the study using a software package (Bonelogic, Disior™, Helsinki, Finland). Significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The hallux valgus angle (HVA) was significantly larger (p=0.026) in the preoperative group (Mdn = 27.52) than in the postoperative group (Mdn = 20). In addition, the Meary sagittal measurement was found to be significantly increased (p=0.033) in the preoperative group (Mdn = -14.28) when compared to the postoperative group (Mdn = -11.15). It was also observed that the intermetatarsal angle was significantly larger (p=0.003) in the preoperative group (Mdn = 15.68) compared to the postoperative group (Mdn = 11.26). Conclusion: The LapiCotton procedure effectively corrected radiographic parameters in patients with HV combined with the medial longitudinal arch collapse. Level of Evidence III; Therapeutic Studies; Comparative Retrospective Study. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2675-2980 2675-2980 |
DOI: | 10.30795/jfootankle.2022.v16.1674 |