Long-term follow-up study on obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients treated with disopyramide: evidences of a notable trend in symptom control within a real-world clinical setting
In obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HOCM), disopyramide is used in patients who remain symptomatic despite -blockers or verapamil. However, effectiveness of disopyramide therapy has not been clearly established due to inconsistent definition of responders and the insufficient length of follo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 2024-08, Vol.11, p.1416600 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HOCM), disopyramide is used in patients who remain symptomatic despite
-blockers or verapamil. However, effectiveness of disopyramide therapy has not been clearly established due to inconsistent definition of responders and the insufficient length of follow-ups reported in literature. To address these shortcomings, we have conducted a retrospective analysis from detailed databases with long follow-up, from two HCM Referral Centers.
62 symptomatic HOCM patients (43% women, age 52 ± 14 years) with left ventricular (LV) outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) ≥ 50 mmHg at rest or during provocation, were recruited from two Italian Centers. Disopyramide was added as second-line therapy in the patients in whom symptoms persisted despite classic pharmacologic treatment. Patients in NYHA class > II at baseline who reached NYHA class II or I, and patients in NYHA class II at baseline who reached NYHA class I or symptoms stabilization were defined as responders.
At follow-up, (mean 4.4 years, IQR 1.1-6.6 years), 47 patients (76%) were responders, whereas 15 (24%) were no-responders. Responders showed larger LV diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) at baseline as compared to no-responders (61 ± 14 vs. 49 ± 16 ml, respectively,
= 0.018), and, at follow-up, reached lower LVOTG than no-responders (43 ± 32 vs. 66 ± 28 mmHg, respectively,
= 0.013), with a LVOTG |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2297-055X 2297-055X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1416600 |