The potential of PGPR and Trichoderma -based bioproducts and resistant cultivars as tools to manage clubroot disease in cruciferous crops

The objective of this research was to determine the potential use of eco-friendly technologies to reduce the clubroot disease caused by , the main constraint of cruciferous crops worldwide. Two commercial bioproducts were evaluated in susceptible broccoli, one based on the PGPR consortium ( , , and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in plant science 2024-01, Vol.14, p.1323530
Hauptverfasser: Moreno-Velandia, Carlos Andrés, Garcia-Arias, Francy Liliana, Dávila-Mora, Lorena, Rodríguez, Edwin, Villabona-Gélvez, Alejandro, Revelo-Gómez, Eliana Gisela, Marcillo-Paguay, Carlos Alberto, Riascos-Ortiz, Donald Heberth, Zuluaga, Andrea Paola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The objective of this research was to determine the potential use of eco-friendly technologies to reduce the clubroot disease caused by , the main constraint of cruciferous crops worldwide. Two commercial bioproducts were evaluated in susceptible broccoli, one based on the PGPR consortium ( , , and K84) and the other one based on Th003 (Tricotec WG). Additionally, the resistant broccoli cv. Monclano® was tested under two concentrations of resting spores (RS) of , 1 × 10 and 1 × 10 RS g of soil. The first phase of evaluations with broccoli was carried out under a greenhouse, while susceptible broccoli, cauliflower, and red cabbage were included in a subsequent field phase. Tebuconazole + Trifloxystrobin mixture and Fluazinam were included as positive controls. The effectiveness of the bioproducts depended on the nature of the biocontrol agent, the concentration of , and the dose of treatment. Tricotec® showed consistent plant growth promotion but no biocontrol effect against clubroot, and the rhizobacteria-based bioproduct significantly reduced the disease in both greenhouse and field experiments. Higher disease severity was observed with the higher dose of Tricotec®. Under field conditions, the rhizobacteria reduced the incidence progress by 26%, 39%, and 57% under high, medium, and low pressure of the pathogen, respectively. However, no reduction of clubroot severity under high pressure of the pathogen was observed. Complete inhibition of club formation in roots was achieved via the fungicide, but a phytotoxic effect was observed under greenhouse conditions. Fungicides reduced the incidence progress of clubroot, but not the severity under high inoculum pressure in the field. The fungicides, the bacterial treatment, and the combination of bioproducts tended to delay the progress of the disease compared with the negative control and Tricotec alone. The resistant broccoli showed a low level of disease under high concentrations of (less than 10% incidence and up to 2% severity). These results suggested the overall potential of commercial tools based on the PGPR consortium and plant resistance to control . The integration of control measures, the role of spp. in -cruciferous pathosystems, and the need to recover highly infested soils will be discussed.
ISSN:1664-462X
1664-462X
DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1323530