Randomized control study of the use of faropenem for treating patients with pulmonary tuberculosis
•Faropenem has been proven useful in replacing ethambutol in the standard regimen.•Faropenem regimen showed a similar treatment success rate to the standard regimen.•Faropenem regimen is well tolerated and has fewer adverse events.•Oral β-lactam antibiotic can be a promising antituberculosis candida...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of infectious diseases 2023-07, Vol.132, p.99-107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Faropenem has been proven useful in replacing ethambutol in the standard regimen.•Faropenem regimen showed a similar treatment success rate to the standard regimen.•Faropenem regimen is well tolerated and has fewer adverse events.•Oral β-lactam antibiotic can be a promising antituberculosis candidate.
Faropenem has antituberculosis activity in vitro but its utility in treating patients with tuberculosis (TB) is unclear.
We conducted an open-label, randomized trial in China, involving newly diagnosed, drug-susceptible pulmonary TB. The control group was treated with the standard 6-month regimen. The experimental group replaced ethambutol with faropenem for 2 months. The primary outcome was the treatment success rate after 6 months of treatment. Noninferiority was confirmed if the lower limit of a 95% one-sided confidence interval (CI) of the difference was greater than −10%.
A total of 227 patients eligible for the study were enrolled in the trial group and the control group in a ratio of 1:1. Baseline characteristics of participants were similar in both groups. In the modified intention-to-treat population, 88.18% of patients in the faropenem group achieved treatment success, and 85.98% of those in the control group were successfully treated, with a difference of 2.2% (95% CI, −6.73-11.13). In the per-protocol population, treatment success was 96.04% in the faropenem group and 95.83% in the control group, with a difference of 2.1% (95% CI, −5.31-5.72). The faropenem group showed noninferiority to the control group in the 6-month treatment success rates. The faropenem group had significantly fewer adverse events (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1201-9712 1878-3511 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.388 |