Randomized control study of the use of faropenem for treating patients with pulmonary tuberculosis

•Faropenem has been proven useful in replacing ethambutol in the standard regimen.•Faropenem regimen showed a similar treatment success rate to the standard regimen.•Faropenem regimen is well tolerated and has fewer adverse events.•Oral β-lactam antibiotic can be a promising antituberculosis candida...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of infectious diseases 2023-07, Vol.132, p.99-107
Hauptverfasser: Shangguan, Yanwan, Guo, Wanru, Feng, Xuewen, Shi, Yunzhen, Li, Xiaomeng, Pan, Zhifen, Hu, Ming, Shi, Jichan, Ding, Cheng, Xia, Jiafeng, Hu, Wenjuan, Ji, Zhongkang, Zhao, Chengjie, Li, Yuecui, He, Zebao, Jin, Lingxiao, Tao, Xiaodong, Zhu, Xinming, Zhang, Xiaoqiang, Song, Qun, Zhu, Yuyin, Zheng, Lin, Jin, Xiuyuan, Huang, Shujuan, Jiang, Liangxiu, Wang, Yuping, Wu, Tiantian, Cao, Dan, Zhang, Ying, Li, Lanjuan, Xu, Kaijin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Faropenem has been proven useful in replacing ethambutol in the standard regimen.•Faropenem regimen showed a similar treatment success rate to the standard regimen.•Faropenem regimen is well tolerated and has fewer adverse events.•Oral β-lactam antibiotic can be a promising antituberculosis candidate. Faropenem has antituberculosis activity in vitro but its utility in treating patients with tuberculosis (TB) is unclear. We conducted an open-label, randomized trial in China, involving newly diagnosed, drug-susceptible pulmonary TB. The control group was treated with the standard 6-month regimen. The experimental group replaced ethambutol with faropenem for 2 months. The primary outcome was the treatment success rate after 6 months of treatment. Noninferiority was confirmed if the lower limit of a 95% one-sided confidence interval (CI) of the difference was greater than −10%. A total of 227 patients eligible for the study were enrolled in the trial group and the control group in a ratio of 1:1. Baseline characteristics of participants were similar in both groups. In the modified intention-to-treat population, 88.18% of patients in the faropenem group achieved treatment success, and 85.98% of those in the control group were successfully treated, with a difference of 2.2% (95% CI, −6.73-11.13). In the per-protocol population, treatment success was 96.04% in the faropenem group and 95.83% in the control group, with a difference of 2.1% (95% CI, −5.31-5.72). The faropenem group showed noninferiority to the control group in the 6-month treatment success rates. The faropenem group had significantly fewer adverse events (P
ISSN:1201-9712
1878-3511
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.388