Impact of frailty on outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in a national cohortCentral MessagePerspective

Objective: We examined the effect of frailty on in-hospital mortality, readmission rates, and hospitalization costs after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in a population-level cohort. Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients who underwent transcathet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JTCVS open 2024-08, Vol.20, p.14-25
Hauptverfasser: Travis J. Miles, MD, Christopher T. Ryan, MD, Katie J. Hogan, PhD, Bhavesh S. Sayal, BS, Christopher B. Sylvester, MD, PhD, Todd K. Rosengart, MD, Joseph S. Coselli, MD, Marc R. Moon, MD, Ravi K. Ghanta, MD, Subhasis Chatterjee, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: We examined the effect of frailty on in-hospital mortality, readmission rates, and hospitalization costs after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in a population-level cohort. Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients who underwent transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement during 2016-2018. Multivariate logistic regression was used to discern independent effects of frailty on outcomes. Kaplan–Meier time-to-event analysis was used to evaluate the effect of frailty on freedom from readmission. Results: A total of 243,619 patients underwent aortic valve replacement: 142,786 (58.6%) transcatheter aortic valve replacements and 100,833 (41.4%) surgical aortic valve replacements. Frail patients constituted 16,388 (11.5%) and 7251 (7.2%) in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement cohorts, respectively. Compared with nonfrail patients, frail patients had greater in-hospital mortality (transcatheter aortic valve replacement: 3.2% vs 1.1%; surgical aortic valve replacement: 6.1% vs 2.0%; both P 
ISSN:2666-2736