Thoracic gas compression during forced expiration is greater in men than women
Intrapleural pressure during a forced vital capacity (VC) maneuver is often in excess of that required to generate maximal expiratory airflow. This excess pressure compresses alveolar gas (i.e., thoracic gas compression [TGC]), resulting in underestimated forced expiratory flows (FEFs) at a given lu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physiological reports 2020-03, Vol.8 (6), p.e14404-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Intrapleural pressure during a forced vital capacity (VC) maneuver is often in excess of that required to generate maximal expiratory airflow. This excess pressure compresses alveolar gas (i.e., thoracic gas compression [TGC]), resulting in underestimated forced expiratory flows (FEFs) at a given lung volume. It is unknown if TGC is influenced by sex; however, because men have larger lungs and stronger respiratory muscles, we hypothesized that men would have greater TGC. We examined TGC across the “effort‐dependent” region of VC in healthy young men (n = 11) and women (n = 12). Subjects performed VC maneuvers at varying efforts while airflow, volume, and esophageal pressure (POES) were measured. Quasistatic expiratory deflation curves were used to obtain lung recoil (PLUNG) and alveolar pressures (i.e., PALV = POES–PLUNG). The raw maximal expiratory flow–volume (MEFVraw) curve was obtained from the “maximum effort” VC maneuver. The TGC‐corrected curve was obtained by constructing a “maximal perimeter” curve from all VC efforts (MEFVcorr). TGC was examined via differences between curves in FEFs (∆FEF), area under the expiratory curves (∆AEX), and estimated compressed gas volume (∆VGC) across the VC range. Men displayed greater total ∆AEX (5.4 ± 2.0 vs. 2.0 ± 1.5 L2·s−1; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2051-817X |
DOI: | 10.14814/phy2.14404 |