Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty for the Determination of Pyridaben and Other Nine Pesticide Residues in Tea by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Objective: To evaluate the uncertainty of determination of nine pesticides in tea by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Methods: The uncertainties of nine pesticide residues in tea were evaluated by GC-MS combined with internal standard quantitative method. Five evaluation components,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Shipin gongye ke-ji 2022-07, Vol.43 (14), p.311-322
Hauptverfasser: Jun LI, Tao CAI, Hongjing DAI, Meicheng SU, Yuan ZHU, Zhen WANG
Format: Artikel
Sprache:chi
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To evaluate the uncertainty of determination of nine pesticides in tea by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Methods: The uncertainties of nine pesticide residues in tea were evaluated by GC-MS combined with internal standard quantitative method. Five evaluation components, including pesticide standards preparation, sample weighing, extraction, purification and detection were studied. Results: The main uncertainty in the determination of pesticides came from the fitting process of standard curve (urel(R)=1.45%~7.93%), sample recovery (urel(Q)a=2.64%~3.54%,urel(Q)b=1.62%~5.89%) and standard solution preparation (urel=2.46%), then the repetition of the sample measurement (urel(A)=0.5%~2.56%), especially at the extremely low concentration. Conclusion: For the reliable results, it is important to choose the accurate sample preparation, the concentration range of standard curve. And when the results indicates positive, reassays should be done in triplicate.
ISSN:1002-0306
DOI:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021090073