Marine Application Evaluation of Monocular SLAM for Underwater Robots

With the development of artificial intelligence technology, visual simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) has become a cheap and efficient localization method for underwater robots. However, there are many problems in underwater visual SLAM, such as more serious underwater imaging distortion,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-06, Vol.22 (13), p.4657
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Yang, Zhou, Li, Li, Haisen, Zhu, Jianjun, Du, Weidong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:With the development of artificial intelligence technology, visual simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) has become a cheap and efficient localization method for underwater robots. However, there are many problems in underwater visual SLAM, such as more serious underwater imaging distortion, more underwater noise, and unclear details. In this paper, we study these two problems and chooses the ORB-SLAM2 algorithm as the method to obtain the motion trajectory of the underwater robot. The causes of radial distortion and tangential distortion of underwater cameras are analyzed, a distortion correction model is constructed, and five distortion correction coefficients are obtained through pool experiments. Comparing the performances of contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), median filtering (MF), and dark channel prior (DCP) image enhancement methods in underwater SLAM, it is found that the DCP method has the best image effect evaluation, the largest number of oriented fast and rotated brief (ORB) feature matching, and the highest localization trajectory accuracy. The results show that the ORB-SLAM2 algorithm can effectively locate the underwater robot, and the correct distortion correction coefficient and DCP improve the stability and accuracy of the ORB-SLAM2 algorithm.
ISSN:1424-8220
1424-8220
DOI:10.3390/s22134657