Sequence-Type Classification of Brain MRI for Acute Stroke Using a Self-Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm

We propose a self-supervised machine learning (ML) algorithm for sequence-type classification of brain MRI using a supervisory signal from DICOM metadata (i.e., a rule-based virtual label). A total of 1787 brain MRI datasets were constructed, including 1531 from hospitals and 256 from multi-center t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostics (Basel) 2023-12, Vol.14 (1), p.70
Hauptverfasser: Na, Seongwon, Ko, Yousun, Ham, Su Jung, Sung, Yu Sub, Kim, Mi-Hyun, Shin, Youngbin, Jung, Seung Chai, Ju, Chung, Kim, Byung Su, Yoon, Kyoungro, Kim, Kyung Won
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We propose a self-supervised machine learning (ML) algorithm for sequence-type classification of brain MRI using a supervisory signal from DICOM metadata (i.e., a rule-based virtual label). A total of 1787 brain MRI datasets were constructed, including 1531 from hospitals and 256 from multi-center trial datasets. The ground truth (GT) was generated by two experienced image analysts and checked by a radiologist. An ML framework called ImageSort-net was developed using various features related to MRI acquisition parameters and used for training virtual labels and ML algorithms derived from rule-based labeling systems that act as labels for supervised learning. For the performance evaluation of ImageSort-net (ML ), we compare and analyze the performances of models trained with human expert labels (ML ), using as a test set blank data that the rule-based labeling system failed to infer from each dataset. The performance of ImageSort-net (ML ) was comparable to that of ML (98.5% and 99%, respectively) in terms of overall accuracy when trained with hospital datasets. When trained with a relatively small multi-center trial dataset, the overall accuracy was relatively lower than that of ML (95.6% and 99.4%, respectively). After integrating the two datasets and re-training them, ML showed higher accuracy than ML trained only on multi-center datasets (95.6% and 99.7%, respectively). Additionally, the multi-center dataset inference performances after the re-training of ML and ML were identical (99.7%). Training of ML algorithms based on rule-based virtual labels achieved high accuracy for sequence-type classification of brain MRI and enabled us to build a sustainable self-learning system.
ISSN:2075-4418
2075-4418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14010070