Use, timing and factors associated with tracheal intubation in septic shock: a prospective multicentric observational study

Background No recommendation exists about the timing and setting for tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in septic shock. Patients and methods This prospective multicenter observational study was conducted in 30 ICUs in France and Spain. All consecutive patients presenting with septic sho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of intensive care 2020-05, Vol.10 (1), p.62-62, Article 62
Hauptverfasser: Darreau, C., Martino, F., Saint-Martin, M., Jacquier, S., Hamel, J. F., Nay, M. A., Terzi, N., Ledoux, G., Roche-Campo, F., Camous, L., Pene, F., Balzer, T., Bagate, F., Lorber, J., Bouju, P., Marois, C., Robert, R., Gaudry, S., Commereuc, M., Debarre, M., Chudeau, N., Labroca, P., Merouani, K., Egreteau, P. Y., Peigne, V., Bornstain, C., Lebas, E., Benezit, F., Vally, S., Lasocki, S., Robert, A., Delbove, A., Lerolle, N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background No recommendation exists about the timing and setting for tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in septic shock. Patients and methods This prospective multicenter observational study was conducted in 30 ICUs in France and Spain. All consecutive patients presenting with septic shock were eligible. The use of tracheal intubation was described across the participating ICUs. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify parameters associated with early intubation (before H8 following vasopressor onset). Results Eight hundred and fifty-nine patients were enrolled. Two hundred and nine patients were intubated early (24%, range 4.5–47%), across the 18 centers with at least 20 patients included. The cumulative intubation rate during the ICU stay was 324/859 (38%, range 14–65%). In the multivariate analysis, seven parameters were significantly associated with early intubation and ranked as follows by decreasing weight: Glasgow score, center effect, use of accessory respiratory muscles, lactate level, vasopressor dose, pH and inability to clear tracheal secretions. Global R -square of the model was only 60% indicating that 40% of the variability of the intubation process was related to other parameters than those entered in this analysis. Conclusion Neurological, respiratory and hemodynamic parameters only partially explained the use of tracheal intubation in septic shock patients. Center effect was important. Finally, a vast part of the variability of intubation remained unexplained by patient characteristics. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT02780466, registered on May 23, 2016. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02780466?term=intubatic&draw=2&rank=1 .
ISSN:2110-5820
2110-5820
DOI:10.1186/s13613-020-00668-6