On the Relationship Between Pain Variability and Relief in Randomized Clinical Trials

Previous research reports suggest greater baseline variability is associated with greater pain relief in those who receive a placebo. However, studies that evidence this association do not control for confounding effects from regression to the mean and natural history. In this report, we analyzed da...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-04, Vol.3, p.844309-844309
Hauptverfasser: Tiwari, Siddharth R, Vigotsky, Andrew D, Apkarian, A Vania
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Previous research reports suggest greater baseline variability is associated with greater pain relief in those who receive a placebo. However, studies that evidence this association do not control for confounding effects from regression to the mean and natural history. In this report, we analyzed data from two randomized clinical trials (Placebo I and Placebo II, total = 139) while adjusting for the effects of natural history and regression to the mean a no treatment group. Results agree between the two placebo groups in each study: both placebo groups showed negligible semi-partial correlations between baseline variability and adjusted response [ (CI ) = 0.22 (0.03, 0.42) and 0 (-0.07, 0.07) for Placebo I and II, respectively]. The no treatment group in Placebo I showed a negative correlation [-0.22 (-0.43, -0.02)], but the no treatment and drug groups in Placebo II's correlations were negligible [-0.02 (-0.08, 0.02) and 0.00 (-0.10, 0.12) for the no treatment and drug groups, respectively]. When modeled as a linear covariate, baseline pain variability accounted for
ISSN:2673-561X
2673-561X
DOI:10.3389/fpain.2022.844309