Common prosperity level evaluation: A comprehensive method based on probabilistic linguistic ordered weighted distance measure, prospect theory, and TOPSIS

Common prosperity is a major research project in China, and the scientific measurement and evaluation of common prosperity is very important. In this study, firstly, we construct a comprehensive evaluation index system for the common prosperity level (CPL). We then develop an evaluation model of CPL...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in psychology 2023-03, Vol.14, p.1152333-1152333
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Erhua, Yu, Feifan, Jiang, Ting, Zeng, Shouzhen, Wang, Dandan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Common prosperity is a major research project in China, and the scientific measurement and evaluation of common prosperity is very important. In this study, firstly, we construct a comprehensive evaluation index system for the common prosperity level (CPL). We then develop an evaluation model of CPL based on prospect theory, probabilistic linguistic ordered weighted distance measure, and the TOPSIS method, wherein we use a probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS) to describe the uncertainty and complexity of the assessment process. Above all, we use prospect theory to reflect the preferences of experts to meet the unique needs for the evaluation of common prosperity. Moreover, we apply the proposed evaluation index system and model to evaluate the CPL of Zhejiang Province, China's first common prosperity demonstration zone, as an example to conduct relevant research. The advantages and effectiveness of the proposed method are verified by the sensitivity and comparative analysis. The findings prove that the application of the new PLTS evaluation framework in CPL assessment is robust. We propose specific suggestions for improving the development of common prosperity.
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1152333