Assessing the Impact of On-Farm Biosecurity Coaching on Farmer Perception and Farm Biosecurity Status in Belgian Poultry Production

Veterinary coaching was tested to assess its efficacy in promoting adherence to biosecurity procedures. Poultry farmers ( = 13) in Belgium were profiled using ADKAR , coached and audited prior to and 6 months after coaching. The ADKAR (Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement) profil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animals (Basel) 2024-08, Vol.14 (17), p.2498
Hauptverfasser: Amalraj, Arthi, Van Meirhaeghe, Hilde, Chantziaras, Ilias, Dewulf, Jeroen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Veterinary coaching was tested to assess its efficacy in promoting adherence to biosecurity procedures. Poultry farmers ( = 13) in Belgium were profiled using ADKAR , coached and audited prior to and 6 months after coaching. The ADKAR (Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement) profiling technique identified 5/13 participating farmers with relatively low scores (≤3) for one or more elements that block change (biosecurity compliance in this case). Education was the only demographic variable that influenced knowledge scores. Through the Biocheck.Ugent methodology, farm biosecurity was assessed and benchmarked to allow for tailored guidance. The farmer, farm veterinarian, and coach defined a farm-specific action plan that covered infrastructure, site access, staff/visitors, purchase policies, transport and depopulation, feed and water supplies, flock management, cleaning and disinfection between flocks, and measures between houses. From a total of 49 proposed actions, 36 were adopted. Purchasing policy had the highest (100%) and cleaning and disinfection had the lowest compliance (38%). Time, cost, and feasibility (e.g., inadequate farm layout) were the main reasons cited for not implementing action points. Overall, biosecurity improved significantly ( = 0.002) from 67.1 ± 5.7% to 70.3 ± 5.7% (mean ± Std. dev). The study, hence, presents convincing proof of how coaching can lead to new solutions not previously considered.
ISSN:2076-2615
2076-2615
DOI:10.3390/ani14172498