Site and incidence of birth canal lacerations from instrumental delivery with mediolateral episiotomy

Abstract Objective Instrument-assisted vaginal delivery is a significant risk factor for birth canal lacerations. Although many obstetricians recently are recommending restrictive rather than a routine episiotomy, reports have shown restrictive episiotomy to be associated with more extensive anterio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2016-12, Vol.55 (6), p.861-862
Hauptverfasser: Chikazawa, Kenro, Ushijima, Junko, Takagi, Kenjiro, Nakamura, Eishin, Samejima, Koki, Kadowaki, Kanako, Horiuchi, Isao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective Instrument-assisted vaginal delivery is a significant risk factor for birth canal lacerations. Although many obstetricians recently are recommending restrictive rather than a routine episiotomy, reports have shown restrictive episiotomy to be associated with more extensive anterior birth canal trauma compared with routine episiotomy. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 110 cases of forceps and vacuum deliveries and investigated the site of birth canal lacerations. Birth canal lacerations were divided into four sites according to direction—anterior, ipsilateral, contralateral, and posterior. Results The frequency of lacerations were, from most to least, posterior (34%), lateral (21.7%), and anterior (1.9%). Moreover, among the lateral lacerations, they were more frequent in the contralateral side of episiotomy than the ipsilateral side (18.9% vs. 4.7%, p  
ISSN:1028-4559
1875-6263
DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2016.05.011