What patients want to know, and what we actually tell them: The ABIDE project

Background We studied to what degree and at whose initiative 25 informational topics, formerly identified as important, are discussed in diagnostic consultations. Methods Audio recordings of clinician–patient consultations of 71 patients and 32 clinicians, collected in eight Dutch memory clinics, we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia : translational research & clinical interventions 2020, Vol.6 (1), p.e12113-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Fruijtier, Agnetha D., Visser, Leonie N.C., Bouwman, Femke H., Lutz, Rogier, Schoonenboom, Niki, Kalisvaart, Kees, Hempenius, Liesbeth, Roks, Gerwin, Boelaarts, Leo, Claus, Jules J., Kleijer, Mariska, Beer, Marlijn, Flier, Wiesje M., Smets, Ellen M.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background We studied to what degree and at whose initiative 25 informational topics, formerly identified as important, are discussed in diagnostic consultations. Methods Audio recordings of clinician–patient consultations of 71 patients and 32 clinicians, collected in eight Dutch memory clinics, were independently content‐coded by two coders. The coding scheme encompassed 25 informational topics. Results Approximately half (Mdn = 12) of the 25 topics were discussed per patient during the diagnostic process, with a higher frequency among individuals receiving a dementia diagnosis (Mdn = 14) compared to others (Mdn = 11). Individual topics ranged from being discussed with 2/71 (3%) to 70/71 (99%) of patients. Patients and/or care partners rarely initiated topic discussion (10%). When they did, they often enquired about one of the least frequently addressed topics. Conclusion Most patients received information on approximately half of the important informational topics. Providing the topic list to patients and care partners beforehand could allow consultation preparation and stimulate participation.
ISSN:2352-8737
2352-8737
DOI:10.1002/trc2.12113