Cytosine base editors optimized for genome editing in potato protoplasts

In this study, we generated and compared three cytidine base editors (CBEs) tailor-made for potato ( Solanum tuberosum ), which conferred up to 43% C-to-T conversion of all alleles in the protoplast pool. Earlier, gene-edited potato plants were successfully generated by polyethylene glycol-mediated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in genome editing 2023-08, Vol.5, p.1247702-1247702
Hauptverfasser: Westberg, Ida, Carlsen, Frida Meijer, Johansen, Ida Elisabeth, Petersen, Bent Larsen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study, we generated and compared three cytidine base editors (CBEs) tailor-made for potato ( Solanum tuberosum ), which conferred up to 43% C-to-T conversion of all alleles in the protoplast pool. Earlier, gene-edited potato plants were successfully generated by polyethylene glycol-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 transformation of protoplasts followed by explant regeneration. In one study, a 3–4-fold increase in editing efficiency was obtained by replacing the standard Arabidopsis thaliana At U6-1 promotor with endogenous potato St U6 promotors driving the expression of the gRNA. Here, we used this optimized construct ( Sp Cas9/ St U6-1::gRNA1, target gRNA sequence GGTC 4 C 5 TTGGAGC 12 AAAAC 17 TGG) for the generation of CBEs tailor-made for potato and tested for C-to-T base editing in the granule-bound starch synthase 1 gene in the cultivar Desiree. First, the Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 was converted into a (D10A) nickase (nCas9). Next, one of three cytosine deaminases from human hAPOBEC3A (A3A), rat (evo_rAPOBEC1) (rA1), or sea lamprey (evo_ Pm CDA1) (CDA1) was C-terminally fused to nCas9 and a uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor, with each module interspaced with flexible linkers. The CBEs were overall highly efficient, with A3A having the best overall base editing activity, with an average 34.5%, 34.5%, and 27% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively, whereas CDA1 showed an average base editing activity of 34.5%, 34%, and 14.25% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively. rA1 exhibited an average base editing activity of 18.75% and 19% at C4 and C5 and was the only base editor to show no C-to-T conversion at C12.
ISSN:2673-3439
2673-3439
DOI:10.3389/fgeed.2023.1247702