Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses. A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases (PROSPERO: CRD42021267715). The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of coloproctology 2023-10, Vol.39 (5), p.375-384
Hauptverfasser: Galletti, Ricardo Purchio, Agareno, Gabriel Andrade, Sesconetto, Lucas de Abreu, Silva, Rafael Benjamim Rosa da, Pandini, Rafael Vaz, Gerbasi, Lucas Soares, Seid, Victor Edmond, Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso, Tustumi, Francisco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses. A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases (PROSPERO: CRD42021267715). The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorectal or coloanal anastomosis and studies that assessed the postoperative results. Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria and were selected. The studied population size ranged from 7 to 78 patients. The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-0.01%). The postoperative complication rate was 40% (95% CI, 40%-50%). The length of hospital stay was 13.68 days (95% CI, 11.3-16.06 days). After redo surgery, 82% of the patients were free of stoma (95% CI, 75%-90%), and 24% of patients (95% CI, 0%-39%) had fecal incontinence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.002) was associated with a lower probability of being free of stoma in meta-regression. Redo colorectal and coloanal anastomoses are strategies to restore colonic continuity. The decision to perform a redo operation should be based on a proper evaluation of the morbidity and mortality risks, the probability of remaining free of stoma, the quality of life, and a functional assessment.
ISSN:2287-9714
2287-9722
DOI:10.3393/ac.2022.00605.0086