Retrieval of rapeseed leaf area index using the PROSAIL model with canopy coverage derived from UAV images as a correction parameter
•Rapeseed LAI was retrieved accurately by PROSAIL and ESM based on UAV images.•PROSAIL was more robust than ESM for rapeseed LAI retrieval in different years and fields.•A canopy coverage parameter derived from UAV images improved LAI retrieval by the PROSAIL model.•The performance of the PROSAIL mo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation 2021-10, Vol.102, p.102373, Article 102373 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Rapeseed LAI was retrieved accurately by PROSAIL and ESM based on UAV images.•PROSAIL was more robust than ESM for rapeseed LAI retrieval in different years and fields.•A canopy coverage parameter derived from UAV images improved LAI retrieval by the PROSAIL model.•The performance of the PROSAIL model was stable with images resolution less than 10 cm.
Leaf area index (LAI), which is an important structural parameter, plays a vital role in evaluating crop growth and yield. In this study, we used the canopy coverage (CC) derived from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images as a correction parameter in the PROSAIL model coupled with a neural network (NN) to improve the accuracy of LAI inversion of rapeseed plots. CC had a significantly positive impact on the accuracy of LAI inversion especially in sparse canopy structure with the 22.24% decrease in the entire dataset and 35.76% decrease in the sparse canopy dataset. We then compared the inversion performances of an empirical statistical model (ESM) based on a vegetation index and the PROSAIL model incorporating CC correction for 2016 and 2018 datasets. The ESM performed better in modeling the 2016 dataset, but its accuracy was much lower for the 2018 dataset (2016: NRMSE = 0.131; 2018: NRSME = 0.348). Overall, the PROSAIL model was more robust over these two datasets (2016: NRMSE = 0.152; 2018: NRMSE = 0.168). In addition, the original-resolution images were resampled to six coarse resolutions to evaluate the influence of image resolution on the LAI inversion performance of the PROSAIL model. When pixel size increased to more than 10 cm, the inversion accuracy began to decrease dramatically. In conclusion, introducing a canopy coverage correction parameter in the PROSAIL model improved its performance in retrieving rapeseed LAI. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1569-8432 1872-826X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102373 |