Diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasonography for hepatic steatosis in a health screening program: a prospective single-center study

This study compared the diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) with that of conventional ultrasonography (US) in assessing hepatic steatosis among individuals undergoing health screening using magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as the refe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) Korea), 2024-07, Vol.43 (4), p.250-262
Hauptverfasser: Pyo, Jeung Hui, Cho, Soo Jin, Choi, Sung Chul, Jee, Jae Hwan, Yun, Jeeyeong, Hwang, Jeong Ah, Park, Goeun, Kim, Kyunga, Kang, Wonseok, Kang, Mira, Byun, Young Hye
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study compared the diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) with that of conventional ultrasonography (US) in assessing hepatic steatosis among individuals undergoing health screening using magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as the reference standard. This single-center prospective study enrolled 427 participants who underwent abdominal MRI and US. Measurements included the attenuation coefficient in tissue attenuation imaging (TAI) and the scatter-distribution coefficient in tissue scatter-distribution imaging (TSI). The correlation between QUS and MRI-PDFF was evaluated. The diagnostic capabilities of QUS, conventional B-mode US, and their combined models for detecting hepatic fat content of ≥5% (MRI-PDFF ≥5%) and ≥10% (MRI-PDFF ≥10%) were compared by analyzing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves. Additionally, clinical risk factors influencing the diagnostic performance of QUS were identified using multivariate linear regression analyses. TAI and TSI were strongly correlated with MRI-PDFF (r=0.759 and r=0.802, respectively; both P
ISSN:2288-5919
2288-5943
DOI:10.14366/usg.24040