Fuzzy Fields. Multi-Sited Ethnography in Sociological Research

Doing participating observation in the "field" is an indispensable characteristic of ethno­graphy. Yet, the problems of constructing a field for ethnographic research attract surprisingly little attention in textbooks and research reports. Socio­logical ethnography does hardly ever aim at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forum, qualitative social research qualitative social research, 2005-09, Vol.6 (3)
Hauptverfasser: Nadai, Eva, Maeder, Christoph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Doing participating observation in the "field" is an indispensable characteristic of ethno­graphy. Yet, the problems of constructing a field for ethnographic research attract surprisingly little attention in textbooks and research reports. Socio­logical ethnography does hardly ever aim at giving holistic representations of clearly bounded (small) groups. It rather focuses on certain theoretically defined aspects of a given culture. Therefore, defining and delineating a field becomes a crucial step in an empirical study. In our article we pro­pose a concept of the field as social world(s) constituted by a set of actors focused on a com­mon concern. With the example of our ongoing research project on exclusion and integration in welfare and economy we argue for a multi-sited approach, which traces its inherently fragmented and multiply situated research object across social worlds. We discuss the problems arising from such a strategy and discuss the function of the field in theory driven sociological ethnography. We contend that multi-sited ethnography is particularly suited for building empirically grounded socio­logical theories. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503288
ISSN:1438-5627
1438-5627