N-mixture models reliably estimate the abundance of small vertebrates
Accurate measures of species abundance are essential to identify conservation strategies. N -mixture models are increasingly used to estimate abundance on the basis of species counts. In this study we tested whether abundance estimates obtained using N- mixture models provide consistent results with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2018-07, Vol.8 (1), p.10357-8, Article 10357 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Accurate measures of species abundance are essential to identify conservation strategies.
N
-mixture models are increasingly used to estimate abundance on the basis of species counts. In this study we tested whether abundance estimates obtained using
N-
mixture models provide consistent results with more traditional approaches requiring capture (capture-mark recapture and removal sampling). We focused on endemic, threatened species of amphibians and reptiles in Italy, for which accurate abundance data are needed for conservation assessments: the Lanza’s Alpine salamander
Salamandra lanzai
, the Ambrosi’s cave salamander
Hydromantes ambrosii
and the Aeolian wall lizard
Podarcis raffonei
. In visual counts, detection probability was variable among species, ranging between 0.14 (Alpine salamanders) and 0.60 (cave salamanders). For all the species, abundance estimates obtained using
N
-mixture models showed limited differences with the ones obtained through capture-mark-recapture or removal sampling. The match was particularly accurate for cave salamanders in sites with limited abundance and for lizards, nevertheless non-incorporating heterogeneity of detection probability increased bias.
N-
mixture models provide reliable abundance estimates that are comparable with the ones of more traditional approaches, and offer additional advantages such as a smaller sampling effort and no need of manipulating individuals, which in turn reduces the risk of harming animals and spreading diseases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-018-28432-8 |