Malicious UAV Detection over Rician Fading Channel: Performance Analysis

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are predicted to be widely used in both military and civilian sectors in the coming years due to their high mobility, low cost, and enhancement of the line-of-sight (LoS) conditions in non-terrestrial networks. Nevertheless, this raises some security issues if they ar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE access 2024-01, Vol.12, p.1-1
Hauptverfasser: Awad, Yousef, Al-Dharrab, Suhail
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are predicted to be widely used in both military and civilian sectors in the coming years due to their high mobility, low cost, and enhancement of the line-of-sight (LoS) conditions in non-terrestrial networks. Nevertheless, this raises some security issues if they are manipulated to cause security threats in restricted locations or to breach user privacy. In order to detect malicious UAVs, radio frequency (RF)-based approaches are adopted to detect ambient RF signals, which can be accomplished with inexpensive RF sensors under both LoS and, in particular, non-line-of-sight (NLoS) conditions. In this paper, we propose a passive detection technique based on received signal strength (RSS), and derive analytical expressions on the detection and false alarm probabilities considering realistic air-to-ground (A2G) channel conditions. A novel low-complexity suboptimal detector is also proposed and its performance is compared to the optimal detection. Monte Carlo simulations are used to confirm the accuracy of the derived expressions under the aforementioned channel conditions. Our mathematical framework, analytical derivations, and simulation results reveal that the sensing node can achieve an accuracy of 0.9 under LoS scenarios, where the NLoS conditions cause some challenges in the accuracy of detection. The low-complexity suboptimal detector for urban and suburban environments has close performance compared to the optimal detection.
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3373309