ePortfolios: Enhancing confidence in student radiographers' communication of radiographic anatomy and pathology. A cross‐sectional study
Introduction In 2020, the Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia made several revisions to its professional capabilities. To address this, medical radiation practitioners, including diagnostic radiographers, are required to escalate urgent findings in all radiographic settings. However, the c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical radiation sciences 2024-09, Vol.71 (3), p.403-411 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
In 2020, the Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia made several revisions to its professional capabilities. To address this, medical radiation practitioners, including diagnostic radiographers, are required to escalate urgent findings in all radiographic settings. However, the confidence of radiographers in articulating descriptions of radiographic findings varies despite this requirement. This cross‐sectional study explores how the implementation of eportfolio affects student self‐perceived confidence in identifying and describing radiographic findings in both an academic and a clinical setting.
Methods
A Qualtrics survey was distributed to second‐year radiography students who had used eportfolios. The survey comprised of four questions using a Likert‐scale and one open‐ended question. Quantitative data were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and qualitative data was thematically assessed.
Results
Overall, 55 of 65 radiographic students (85%) completed the survey. Confidence (strongly agree and agree) decreased from 89% to 74% between academic and clinical environments when identifying abnormalities, and 89% to 73% when describing findings. This finding highlights the challenges students face when in the clinical environment. Wilcoxon signed rank test analysed a statistically significant relation between the two environments (P 0.05). Following a review of the qualitative data, three recurring themes were identified among responses.
Conclusion
ePortfolios assist in improving confidence in identification and description of radiographic abnormalities, particularly in an academic setting. The clinical environment presents unique challenges which may limit student clinical performance; however, this requires further investigation.
This study investigates the impact of eportfolios on the confidence of second‐year radiography students in identifying and describing radiographic findings in academic and clinical settings. Results indicate a decrease in confidence in the clinical environment compared to the academic setting, highlighting challenges faced by students. While eportfolios show promise in enhancing confidence, further exploration of factors influencing clinical performance is warranted. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2051-3895 2051-3909 2051-3909 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmrs.787 |