Confronting parachute science in conservation
Each piece reminds us that there are better ways to do science and conservation involving equitable partnerships that address on-the-ground priorities, benefit all parties involved, and result in positive research, learning and conservation outcomes. Using a case study of a program designed to incre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation science and practice 2022-05, Vol.4 (5), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Each piece reminds us that there are better ways to do science and conservation involving equitable partnerships that address on-the-ground priorities, benefit all parties involved, and result in positive research, learning and conservation outcomes. Using a case study of a program designed to increase national capacity for conservation science and practice in Lao PDR, they shift the focus toward capacity building, education and measuring long-term conservation impact. International collaborative conservation efforts need to put away the parachutes and strategically plan for building equitable scientific collaborations in support of locally driven, solutions-focused, sustainable conservation action. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2578-4854 2578-4854 |
DOI: | 10.1111/csp2.12681 |