Circulating Malondialdehyde-Modified LDL-Related Variables and Coronary Artery Stenosis in Asymptomatic Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Aims. To elucidate the levels of malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL)-related variables for predicting coronary artery stenosis (CAS) by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods. Enrolled were 36 Japanese patients with T2DM who underwent CCTA and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Diabetes Research 2015-01, Vol.2015 (2015), p.1-8
Hauptverfasser: Yatoh, Shigeru, Yahagi, Naoya, Yagyu, Hiroaki, Sone, Hirohito, Shimano, Hitoshi, Kobayashi, Kazuto, Iwasaki, Hitoshi, Saito, Kazumi, Heianza, Yoriko, Kodama, Satoru, Sato, Akira, Suzuki, Hiroaki, Fujihara, Kazuya, Takahashi, Akimitsu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims. To elucidate the levels of malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL)-related variables for predicting coronary artery stenosis (CAS) by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods. Enrolled were 36 Japanese patients with T2DM who underwent CCTA and in whom MDA-LDL levels were measured. Definition of CAS was luminal narrowing of ≥50%. Trends through tertiles of each MDA-LDL-related variable were analyzed with a general linear model. The ability of each MDA-LDL-related variable to predict CAS was compared to areas under the curve (AUCs) in receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Results. Seventeen patients had CAS. Each MDA-LDL-related variable was an independent predictor of CAS ( P = 0.039 for MDALDL, P = 0.013 for MDA-LDL/LDL-C, P = 0.047 for MDA-LDL/HDL-C, and P = 0.013 for (MDA-LDL/LDL-C)/HDL-C). AUCs of MDA-LDL, MDA-LDL/LDL-C, MDA-LDL/HDL-C, and (MDA-LDL/LDL-C)/HDL-C were 0.675 (95% CI 0.496–0.854), 0.765 (0.602–0.927), 0.752 (0.592–0.913), and 0.799 (0.643–0.955), respectively, for predicting CAS. Trends throughout the tertiles showed significant associations between MDA-LDL/LDL-C, MDA-LDL/HDL-C, or (MDALDL/LDL-C)/HDL-C and CAS ( P = 0.003 for MDA-LDL/LDL-C, P = 0.042 for MDA-LDL/HDL-C, and P = 0.001 for (MDA-LDL/LDL-C)/HDL-C). Conclusions. Data suggest that measurements of MDA-LDL/LDL-C, MDA-LDL/HDLC, and (MDA-LDL/LDL-C)/HDL-C are useful for predicting CAS.
ISSN:2314-6745
2314-6753
DOI:10.1155/2015/507245