Automated plan generation for prostate radiotherapy patients using deep learning and scripted optimization

Treatment planning is a time-intensive task that could be automated. We aimed to develop a “single-click” workflow, fully deployed within a commercial treatment planning system (TPS), for autoplanning prostate radiotherapy treatment plans using predictions from a deep learning model (DLM). Automatic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics and imaging in radiation oncology 2024-10, Vol.32, p.100641, Article 100641
Hauptverfasser: Church, Cody, Yap, Michelle, Bessrour, Mohamed, Lamey, Michael, Granville, Dal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Treatment planning is a time-intensive task that could be automated. We aimed to develop a “single-click” workflow, fully deployed within a commercial treatment planning system (TPS), for autoplanning prostate radiotherapy treatment plans using predictions from a deep learning model (DLM). Automatically generated treatment plans were created with a single script, executed from within a commercial TPS scripting environment, that performed two stages sequentially. Initially, a 3D dose distribution was predicted with a ResUNet DLM. The DLM was trained and validated using previously treated datasets (n = 120) which used 3D contours as inputs. Following this, dose predictions were converted into treatment plans by extracting dose-volume metrics from the predictions to use as objectives for the inverse optimizer within the TPS. An independent test dataset (n = 20) was used to evaluate the similarity between automated and clinical plans. For planning target volumes, the median percentage difference and interquartile range between the automatically generated plans and clinical plans were 0.4% [0.2-1.1%] for the V100%, −0.5% [(−1.0)-(−0.2)%] for D99% and −0.5% [(−1.0)-(−0.2)%] for D95%. Bladder and rectum volume-at-dose objectives agreed within −6.1% [(−12.5)-0.9%]. The conversion of the DLM prediction into a treatment plan took 15 min [13-16 min]. An automatic plan generation workflow that uses a DL model with scripted optimization was fully deployed in a commercial TPS. Autoplans were compared to previously treated clinical plans and were found to be non-inferior.
ISSN:2405-6316
2405-6316
DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2024.100641