Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study

The World Health Organization has advocated for the integration of dental care into the primary healthcare (PHC) setting, including oral urgent treatment (OUT). However, the knowledge necessary for OUT implementation in this setting is still limited. Thus, this study aimed to describe the impact of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC health services research 2020-11, Vol.20 (1), p.1012-1012, Article 1012
Hauptverfasser: Ramos, Danielle Viana Ribeiro, Miraglia, João Luiz, Monteiro, Camila Nascimento, Borchardt, Danielle, Tribis, Leonardo, Sanchez, Thais Paragis, Bonfim, Daiana, da Costa Palacio, Danielle, da Luz Rosário de Souza, Maria, de Brito Mota, Marília Jesus Batista
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The World Health Organization has advocated for the integration of dental care into the primary healthcare (PHC) setting, including oral urgent treatment (OUT). However, the knowledge necessary for OUT implementation in this setting is still limited. Thus, this study aimed to describe the impact of the implementation of oral disease risk assessment tools for oral health management in PHC. This was a cross-sectional study that included individuals served by a single public PHC unit, with integrated oral healthcare teams, located in the south region of the city of São Paulo, Brazil, between April of 2015 and March of 2017. Data were collected from dental records. Three co-primary endpoints: same day treatment offered, first future appointment scheduled fulfilled, and treatment plan completed were compared before and after the implementation of oral disease risk assessment for OUT. A total of 1214 individuals that sought OUT, 599 before and 615 after the implementation of oral disease risk assessment for OUT were included in the study. All three co-primary endpoints had significant changes after the implementation of oral disease risk assessment for OUT. Individuals were significantly more likely to be offered same day treatment after (39.9%; 95% CI:36.0-43.9%) than before (9.4%; 95% CI: 7.2-12.0%), to fulfill their first future appointment scheduled after (34.9%; 95% CI:31.1-38.8%) than before (20.7%; 95% CI: 17.5-24.2%), and to have their treatment plan completed after (14.3%; 95% CI:11.6-17.4%) than before (10.0%; 95% CI: 7.7-12.7%) the intervention. This study provided evidence of the positive impact oral disease risk assessment tools could have in the organization of OUT in PHC settings.
ISSN:1472-6963
1472-6963
DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05859-2