A comparative study between HoLEP and bipolar TURP in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Introduction: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most frequent diseases in men. The laser treatment for BPH has challenged TURP due to advances in laser technology, a better understanding of tissue-laser interactions and rowing clinical experience. Objective: To evaluate the safety and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:"Qazaqstannyn͡g︡ klinikalyq medit͡s︡inasy" zhurnaly 2023-04, Vol.20 (2), p.15-19
Hauptverfasser: Kanchi V, Bhargava Reddy, Galeti, Ershad Hussain, Begum S, Gousia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most frequent diseases in men. The laser treatment for BPH has challenged TURP due to advances in laser technology, a better understanding of tissue-laser interactions and rowing clinical experience. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of HoLEP, comparing it to Bipolar TURP. Material and methods: This was a prospective study to evaluate the outcomes in BPH patients undergoing surgery by HOLEP and Bipolar TURP done between January 2018 to December 2019. A total of 80 Patients were enrolled, 40 undergoing HoLEP and the other 40 Bipolar TURP for BPH. The procedures were performed by a single surgeon. All patients with symptomatic BPH and who were candidates for surgical treatment were included. Patients with previous prostate surgery, urethral surgery, history of prostate cancer or neurogenic bladder were excluded. Results: Baseline parameters were almost similar between both the groups in terms of age, IPSS, QOL, Q max, PVR, and gland size. Operative time and resected gland weight were more in HoLEP arm (p
ISSN:1812-2892
2313-1519
DOI:10.23950/jcmk/13129