Glomerular Disease Education Experience across Nephrology Fellowship Programs: An International Survey

Abstract Introduction: Glomerulonephritis (GN) education is an important, albeit a challenging, component of nephrology fellowship training. We hypothesized that trainee experience varies widely across programs, leading to differences in self-reported competency levels in the diagnosis and management of glomerular diseases. Methods: The Glomerular Disease Study & Trial Consortium (GlomCon) conducted an anonymous online survey to determine the educational experience of nephrology trainees. We used multiple-choice questions to obtain data about (a) curriculum-based education, (b) dedicated specialty clinic, and (c) exposure to pathology. We leveraged a visual analog scale of 1–100 (with a higher number indicating a higher comfort level) to assess self-reported levels of clinical competency. The survey was disseminated via email to the subscribing members of GlomCon and through Twitter. Results: In total, there were 109 respondents to our survey, and 56% were from training programs in the USA. Exposure to a specialized GN clinic was reported by 45%, while 77% reported the presence of an onsite nephropathologist at their training program. Self-reported competency scores were 59 ± 25 and 52 ± 25 for diagnosis and treatment of glomerular diseases, respectively. Days spent in a GN clinic per year, years of fellowship, and dedicated nephropathology didactics were associated with higher diagnosis and treatment competency scores. Conclusion: Trainees report a wide variation in glomerular disease education across fellowship programs. A lack of nephropathology exposure and a dedicated GN curriculum was associated with lower scores in self-reported clinical competency in caring for patients with glomerular disease.