Diagnostic and treatment challenges in focal liver disease

Finding a focal liver lesion during screening may not uncommonly lead to a misinterpretation of the results of radiological diagnostics. Based on the consolidation of our wide experience (more than 1000 cases) of surgical treatment of patients with various focal liver diseases, we analyzed the main...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alʹmanakh klinicheskoĭ medit͡s︡iny 2018-11, Vol.46 (6), p.618-630
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, A. V., Karmazanovsky, G. G., Bugaev, S. A., Chugunov, A. O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; rus
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Finding a focal liver lesion during screening may not uncommonly lead to a misinterpretation of the results of radiological diagnostics. Based on the consolidation of our wide experience (more than 1000 cases) of surgical treatment of patients with various focal liver diseases, we analyzed the main causes of diagnostic pitfalls and, as a consequence, errors in the treatment of these patients. The most typical objective and subjective diagnostic pitfalls that may lead to a wrong treatment strategy are discussed with clinical cases taken as examples. The objective factors are related to the rarity of disease, absence of pathognomonic semiotics, as well as limitations in the resolution power of imaging methods. In addition, a misinterpretation of results of ultrasound examination, magnetic resonance imaging and multiaxial computed tomography may be explained by identical properties of images in different tumors related to similar physical and chemical properties of a  lesion. The subjective factors are related to a wrong interpretation of clinical and instrumental assessment data, or insufficient evaluation needed in an individual patient. The number of diagnostic and treatment errors could be decreased by a multidisciplinary approach taking into account the opinions of various profile experts.
ISSN:2072-0505
2587-9294
DOI:10.18786/2072-0505-2018-46-6-618-630