Acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility for screening: A population‐based survey

Background Using risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility has the potential to improve efficiency of screening. Objectives To compare the public acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different approaches to determine eligibility for screening. Design An online populati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 2021-04, Vol.24 (2), p.341-351
Hauptverfasser: Usher‐Smith, Juliet A., Harvey‐Kelly, Laragh L. W., Rossi, Sabrina H., Harrison, Hannah, Griffin, Simon J., Stewart, Grant D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Using risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility has the potential to improve efficiency of screening. Objectives To compare the public acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different approaches to determine eligibility for screening. Design An online population‐based survey of 668 adults in the UK aged 45‐79 including a series of scenarios in the context of a potential kidney cancer screening programme in which eligibility was determined by age, sex, age and sex combined, a simple risk score (age, sex, body mass index, smoking status), a complex risk score additionally incorporating family history and lifestyle, or a genetic risk score. Outcome measures We used multi‐level ordinal logistic regression to compare acceptability and potential uptake within individuals and multivariable ordinal logistic regression differences between individuals. Results Using sex, age and sex, or the simple risk score were less acceptable than age (P 
ISSN:1369-6513
1369-7625
DOI:10.1111/hex.13175