Acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility for screening: A population‐based survey
Background Using risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility has the potential to improve efficiency of screening. Objectives To compare the public acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different approaches to determine eligibility for screening. Design An online populati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 2021-04, Vol.24 (2), p.341-351 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Using risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility has the potential to improve efficiency of screening.
Objectives
To compare the public acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different approaches to determine eligibility for screening.
Design
An online population‐based survey of 668 adults in the UK aged 45‐79 including a series of scenarios in the context of a potential kidney cancer screening programme in which eligibility was determined by age, sex, age and sex combined, a simple risk score (age, sex, body mass index, smoking status), a complex risk score additionally incorporating family history and lifestyle, or a genetic risk score.
Outcome measures
We used multi‐level ordinal logistic regression to compare acceptability and potential uptake within individuals and multivariable ordinal logistic regression differences between individuals.
Results
Using sex, age and sex, or the simple risk score were less acceptable than age (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1369-6513 1369-7625 |
DOI: | 10.1111/hex.13175 |