Predictive Value of Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Evaluated with Scheimpflug High-Speed Video (Corvis ST) on the Visual Field Progression in Prostaglandin Treated Ocular Hypertension and Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients

Introduction The aim of this work is to compare the Corvis ST stress–strain index (SSI) and highest concavity (HC) parameters at baseline and 1 month after initiating monotherapy with prostaglandin analogues (PGs) in eyes showing visual field (VF) progression or stability. Methods In this prospectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology and Therapy 2023-12, Vol.12 (6), p.3177-3186
Hauptverfasser: Martinez-Sánchez, Marta I., Bolívar, Gema, Dastiridou, Anna, Escámez, Purificación, Teus, Miguel A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction The aim of this work is to compare the Corvis ST stress–strain index (SSI) and highest concavity (HC) parameters at baseline and 1 month after initiating monotherapy with prostaglandin analogues (PGs) in eyes showing visual field (VF) progression or stability. Methods In this prospective, single-center, observational study, newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve OAG patients were examined at baseline and 1 month after beginning monotherapy with topical PGs monotherapy. Goldmann applanation tonometry pressure readings, Corneal Hysteresis (ORA-CH), and the Corvis ST measurements were obtained at both visits. VF progression (Humphrey) was evaluated based on data from 6 years of follow-up after the baseline visit. Stress–strain index (SSI) and HC parameters in progressing (P) and non-progressing (NP) eyes were the main outcome measures. Results Sixty-three eyes were analyzed; mean age was 64.63 ± 11.26 years; 47 eyes were NP and 16 eyes were P according to the event analysis performed by the Humphrey device. There were no significant differences in IOP, CCT, or Corvis parameters between NP and P groups at baseline. Nevertheless, at 1 month, the SSI index was 1.60 ± 0.34 vs. 1.80 ± 0.34 ( p  = 0.003) in NP vs. P eyes, respectively. HC parameters were different between the groups at 1 month ( p  
ISSN:2193-8245
2193-6528
DOI:10.1007/s40123-023-00810-0