Evaluation of pretreatment routes for seawater desalination by nanofiltration

Nanofiltration (NF) has been used as the default sulfate removal process in platforms to treat seawater for water flooding. Seawater is generally pretreated by chlorination and cartridge filters to reduce fouling of the membranes; however, this pretreatment is insufficient to provide water quality h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water science and technology 2024-01, Vol.89 (2), p.454-469
Hauptverfasser: Loreti Hupsel, Amanda, Borges, Cristiano Piacsek, da Fonseca, Fabiana Valéria, Barbosa, Gisele Mattedi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Nanofiltration (NF) has been used as the default sulfate removal process in platforms to treat seawater for water flooding. Seawater is generally pretreated by chlorination and cartridge filters to reduce fouling of the membranes; however, this pretreatment is insufficient to provide water quality high enough to maintain the productivity of the NF membranes. In this study, the performances of two different pretreatment routes were evaluated. Microfiltration (MF) was evaluated as a replacement for cartridge filters, and the advanced oxidation process UV/H O was evaluated as an additional stage of pretreatment upstream of the cartridge filters. The permeability of the NF membranes after 12 h of seawater sulfate removal in a bench system was 4.4 L·h ·m ·bar when the UV/H O process was adopted as the pretreatment and 2.9 L·h ·m ·bar when the MF process was adopted, compared to 1.6 L·h ·m ·bar achieved for the pretreatment with the cartridge filter alone. These results indicate that NF membrane fouling was significantly higher when seawater was pretreated only by the cartridge filter in comparison to both proposed pretreatments. An economic analysis showed that both systems are economically viable and can potentially reduce the operational costs of the NF sulfate removal process on platforms.
ISSN:0273-1223
1996-9732
DOI:10.2166/wst.2024.005