Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Against Cutibacterium acnes Implant-Associated Infections: An in Vitro Trial

Antibiotic management of low-virulent implant-associated infections induced by may be compromised by multi-drug resistance development, side effects, and increased cost. Therefore, we sought to assess the effects of shock wave therapy against the above pathogen using an in vitro model of infection....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microorganisms (Basel) 2020-05, Vol.8 (5), p.743
Hauptverfasser: Tsikopoulos, Konstantinos, Drago, Lorenzo, Koutras, Georgios, Givissis, Panagiotis, Vagdatli, Eleni, Soukiouroglou, Prodromos, Papaioannidou, Paraskevi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Antibiotic management of low-virulent implant-associated infections induced by may be compromised by multi-drug resistance development, side effects, and increased cost. Therefore, we sought to assess the effects of shock wave therapy against the above pathogen using an in vitro model of infection. We used a total of 120 roughened titanium alloy disks, simulating orthopedic biomaterials, to assess the results of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) against (ATCC 11827) biofilms relative to untreated control. In particular, we considered 1.6 to 2.5 Bar with a frequency ranging from 8-11 Hz and 95 to 143 impulses per disk to investigate the antibacterial effect of rESWT against planktonic (free-floating) and biofilm forms. Planktonic bacteria load diminished by 54% compared to untreated control after a 1.8-bar setting with a frequency of 8 Hz and 95 impulses was applied (median absorbance (MA) for intervention vs. control groups was 0.9245 (IQR= 0.888 to 0.104) vs. 0.7705 (IQR = 0.712 to 0.864), respectively, = 0.001). Likewise, a statistically significant reduction in the amount of biofilm relative to untreated control was documented when the above setting was considered (MA for treatment vs biofilm control groups was 0.244 (IQR= 0.215-0.282) and 0.298 (IQR = 0.247-0.307), respectively, = 0.033). A 50% biofilm eradication was documented following application of low-pressure and low-frequency radial shock waves, so rESWT could be investigated as an adjuvant treatment to antibiotics, but it cannot be recommended as a standalone treatment against device-associated infections induced by
ISSN:2076-2607
2076-2607
DOI:10.3390/microorganisms8050743