Comparison of ELISA- and SIMOA-based quantification of plasma Aβ ratios for early detection of cerebral amyloidosis

Blood-based amyloid biomarkers may provide a non-invasive, cost-effective and scalable manner for detecting cerebral amyloidosis in early disease stages. In this prospective cross-sectional study, we quantified plasma Aβ /Aβ ratios with both routinely available ELISAs and novel SIMOA Amyblood assays...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's research & therapy 2020-12, Vol.12 (1), p.162-162, Article 162
Hauptverfasser: De Meyer, Steffi, Schaeverbeke, Jolien M, Verberk, Inge M W, Gille, Benjamin, De Schaepdryver, Maxim, Luckett, Emma S, Gabel, Silvy, Bruffaerts, Rose, Mauroo, Kimberley, Thijssen, Elisabeth H, Stoops, Erik, Vanderstichele, Hugo M, Teunissen, Charlotte E, Vandenberghe, Rik, Poesen, Koen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Blood-based amyloid biomarkers may provide a non-invasive, cost-effective and scalable manner for detecting cerebral amyloidosis in early disease stages. In this prospective cross-sectional study, we quantified plasma Aβ /Aβ ratios with both routinely available ELISAs and novel SIMOA Amyblood assays, and provided a head-to-head comparison of their performances to detect cerebral amyloidosis in a nondemented elderly cohort (n = 199). Participants were stratified according to amyloid-PET status, and the performance of plasma Aβ /Aβ to detect cerebral amyloidosis was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. We additionally investigated the correlations of plasma Aβ ratios with amyloid-PET and CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, as well as platform agreement using Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis for both Aβ isoforms. ELISA and SIMOA plasma Aβ /Aβ detected cerebral amyloidosis with identical accuracy (ELISA: area under curve (AUC) 0.78, 95% CI 0.72-0.84; SIMOA: AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85), and both increased the performance of a basic demographic model including only age and APOE-ε4 genotype (p ≤ 0.02). ELISA and SIMOA had positive predictive values of respectively 41% and 36% in cognitively normal elderly and negative predictive values all exceeding 88%. Plasma Aβ /Aβ correlated similarly with amyloid-PET for both platforms (Spearman ρ = - 0.32, p 
ISSN:1758-9193
1758-9193
DOI:10.1186/s13195-020-00728-w