Cultural Differences in How People Deal with Ridicule and Laughter: Differential Item Functioning between the Taiwanese Chinese and Canadian English Versions of the PhoPhiKat-45

The PhoPhiKat-45 measures three dispositions toward ridicule and laughter, including gelotophobia (i.e., the fear of being laughed at), gelotophilia (i.e., the joy of being laughed at), and katagelasticism (i.e., the joy of laughing at others). Despite numerous cultural adaptations, there is a pauci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education psychology and education, 2023-01, Vol.13 (2), p.238-258
Hauptverfasser: Lau, Chloe, Swindall, Taylor, Chiesi, Francesca, Quilty, Lena C, Chen, Hsueh-Chih, Chan, Yu-Chen, Ruch, Willibald, Proyer, René, Bruno, Francesco, Saklofske, Donald H, Torres-Marín, Jorge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The PhoPhiKat-45 measures three dispositions toward ridicule and laughter, including gelotophobia (i.e., the fear of being laughed at), gelotophilia (i.e., the joy of being laughed at), and katagelasticism (i.e., the joy of laughing at others). Despite numerous cultural adaptations, there is a paucity of cross-cultural studies investigating measurement invariance of this measure. Undergraduate students from a Canadian university ( = 1467; 71.4% females) and 14 universities in Taiwan ( = 1274; 64.6% females) completed the English and Chinese PhoPhiKat-45 measures, respectively. Item response theory and differential item functioning analyses demonstrated that most items were well-distributed across the latent continuum. Five of 45 items were flagged for DIF, but all values had negligible effect sizes (McFadden's pseudo < 0.13). The Canadian sample was further subdivided into subsamples who identified as European White born in Canada ( = 567) and Chinese born in China, Hong Kong, or Taiwan ( = 180). In the subgroup analyses, no evidence of DIF was found. Findings support the utility of this measure across these languages and samples.
ISSN:2254-9625
2174-8144
2254-9625
DOI:10.3390/ejihpe13020019