Is Euro-Collins better than ringer lactate in live related donor renal transplantation?
Euro-Collins and University of Wisconsin are preferred solutions in cadaveric renal transplantation. There are no guidelines regarding the perfusion fluids in live donor renal transplantation. We studied whether Euro-Collins was better than Ringer lactate in terms of protecting allograft function. A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of urology 2007-07, Vol.23 (3), p.265-269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Euro-Collins and University of Wisconsin are preferred solutions in cadaveric renal transplantation. There are no guidelines regarding the perfusion fluids in live donor renal transplantation. We studied whether Euro-Collins was better than Ringer lactate in terms of protecting allograft function.
A double-blind permuted randomized trial comparing Euro-Collins and Ringer lactate was performed on 100 patients undergoing live related donor renal transplantation. Outcome variable was serum creatinine.
Age, sex, donor nephrectomy and ischemia times, kidney temperature, time of first appearance of urine was not significantly different in both the groups. Fall in serum creatinine was significantly more in Euro-Collins than Ringer lactate in the first postoperative week (P- 80 min was found to be significant (P-0.024). Twelve kidneys in Euro-Collins and 17 in the Ringer lactate group had cold ischemia times of >/=80 min and time to nadir creatinine was 4.33 +/-3.74 and 12.76+/- 12.68 days (P-0.035).
Renal function normalized rapidly when Euro-Collins was used. Cold ischemia time of >/= 80 min was the most important factor affecting the graft function and perfusing with Euro-Collins could protect the allograft. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0970-1591 1998-3824 |
DOI: | 10.4103/0970-1591.33722 |