Denosumab versus zoledronate for the treatment of low bone mineral density in male HIV-infected patients

We aimed to compare annual changes in the bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) and the femoral neck (FN) in males with HIV-associated osteoporosis treated with either zoledronate (ZOL) or denosumab (Dmab). In this open label, 12-month, prospective, multicenter, cohort study, 23 male p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bone Reports 2021-12, Vol.15, p.101128-101128, Article 101128
Hauptverfasser: Makras, Polyzois, Petrikkos, Panagiotis, Anastasilakis, Athanasios D., Kolynou, Artemis, Katsarou, Angeliki, Tsachouridou, Olga, Metallidis, Symeon, Yavropoulou, Maria P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We aimed to compare annual changes in the bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) and the femoral neck (FN) in males with HIV-associated osteoporosis treated with either zoledronate (ZOL) or denosumab (Dmab). In this open label, 12-month, prospective, multicenter, cohort study, 23 male people living with HIV (PLWH) under antiretroviral therapy (ART) with low BMD were administered either a single iv infusion of ZOL 5 mg (n = 10) or Dmab 60 mg sc injections biannually (n = 13). Fourteen age-matched male PLWH with normal BMD served as controls. BMD was measured at baseline and at 12 months. LS-BMD increased within both treatment groups at 12 months (ZOL 5.43% ± 3.60%, p = 0.001; Dmab 5.76% ± 3.44%, p 
ISSN:2352-1872
2352-1872
DOI:10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101128