Association of Volumetric Epicardial Adipose Tissue Quantification and Cardiac Structure and Function

Background Epicardial adipose tissue ( EAT ) is in immediate apposition to the underlying myocardium and, therefore, has the potential to influence myocardial systolic and diastolic function or myocardial geometry, through paracrine or compressive mechanical effects. We aimed to review the associati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Heart Association 2018-12, Vol.7 (23), p.e009975-e009975
Hauptverfasser: Nerlekar, Nitesh, Muthalaly, Rahul G, Wong, Nathan, Thakur, Udit, Wong, Dennis T L, Brown, Adam J, Marwick, Thomas H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Epicardial adipose tissue ( EAT ) is in immediate apposition to the underlying myocardium and, therefore, has the potential to influence myocardial systolic and diastolic function or myocardial geometry, through paracrine or compressive mechanical effects. We aimed to review the association between volumetric EAT and markers of myocardial function and geometry. Methods and Results PubMed, Medline, and Embase were searched from inception to May 2018. Studies were included only if complete EAT volume or mass was reported and related to a measure of myocardial function and/or geometry. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to evaluate the weighted mean difference of EAT in patients with and without diastolic dysfunction. Heterogeneity of data reporting precluded meta-analysis for systolic and geometric associations. In the 22 studies included in the analysis, there was a significant correlation with increasing EAT and presence of diastolic dysfunction and mean e' (average mitral annular tissue Doppler velocity) and E/e' (early inflow / annular velocity ratio) but not E/A (ratio of peak early (E) and late (A) transmitral inflow velocities), independent of adiposity measures. There was a greater EAT in patients with diastolic dysfunction (weighted mean difference, 24.43 mL; 95% confidence interval, 18.5-30.4 mL; P
ISSN:2047-9980
2047-9980
DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.009975