Adaptive Nonsingular Fast Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Shape Memory Alloy Actuated System

Due to its high power-to-weight ratio, low weight, and silent operation, shape memory alloy (SMA) is widely used as a muscle-like soft actuator in intelligent bionic robot systems. However, hysteresis nonlinearity and multi-valued mapping behavior can severely impact trajectory tracking accuracy. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Actuators 2024-09, Vol.13 (9), p.367
Hauptverfasser: Li, Xiaoguang, Zhi, Wenzhuo, Shi, Enming, Fan, Xiaoliang, Zhao, Ming, Zhang, Bi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Due to its high power-to-weight ratio, low weight, and silent operation, shape memory alloy (SMA) is widely used as a muscle-like soft actuator in intelligent bionic robot systems. However, hysteresis nonlinearity and multi-valued mapping behavior can severely impact trajectory tracking accuracy. This paper proposes an adaptive nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control (ANFTSMC) scheme aimed at enhancing position tracking performance in SMA-actuated systems by addressing hysteresis nonlinearity, uncertain dynamics, and external disturbances. Firstly, a simplified third-order actuator model is developed and a variable gain extended state observer (VGESO) is employed to estimate unmodeled dynamics and external disturbances within finite time. Secondly, a novel nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control (NFTSMC) law is designed to overcome singularity issues, reduce chattering, and guarantee finite-time convergence of the system states. Finally, the ANFTSMC scheme, integrating NFTSMC with VGESO, is proposed to achieve precise position tracking for the prosthetic hand. The convergence of the closed-loop control system is validated using Lyapunov’s stability theory. Experimental results demonstrate that the external pulse disturbance error of ANFTSMC is 8.19°, compared to 19.21° for the comparative method. Furthermore, the maximum absolute error for ANFTSMC is 0.63°, whereas the comparative method shows a maximum absolute error of 1.03°. These results underscore the superior performance of the proposed ANFTSMC algorithm.
ISSN:2076-0825
2076-0825
DOI:10.3390/act13090367