Development and validation of an artificial intelligence system for grading colposcopic impressions and guiding biopsies

Colposcopy diagnosis and directed biopsy are the key components in cervical cancer screening programs. However, their performance is limited by the requirement for experienced colposcopists. This study aimed to develop and validate a Colposcopic Artificial Intelligence Auxiliary Diagnostic System (C...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC medicine 2020-12, Vol.18 (1), p.406-406, Article 406
Hauptverfasser: Xue, Peng, Tang, Chao, Li, Qing, Li, Yuexiang, Shen, Yu, Zhao, Yuqian, Chen, Jiawei, Wu, Jianrong, Li, Longyu, Wang, Wei, Li, Yucong, Cui, Xiaoli, Zhang, Shaokai, Zhang, Wenhua, Zhang, Xun, Ma, Kai, Zheng, Yefeng, Qian, Tianyi, Ng, Man Tat Alexander, Liu, Zhihua, Qiao, Youlin, Jiang, Yu, Zhao, Fanghui
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Colposcopy diagnosis and directed biopsy are the key components in cervical cancer screening programs. However, their performance is limited by the requirement for experienced colposcopists. This study aimed to develop and validate a Colposcopic Artificial Intelligence Auxiliary Diagnostic System (CAIADS) for grading colposcopic impressions and guiding biopsies. Anonymized digital records of 19,435 patients were obtained from six hospitals across China. These records included colposcopic images, clinical information, and pathological results (gold standard). The data were randomly assigned (7:1:2) to a training and a tuning set for developing CAIADS and to a validation set for evaluating performance. The agreement between CAIADS-graded colposcopic impressions and pathology findings was higher than that of colposcopies interpreted by colposcopists (82.2% versus 65.9%, kappa 0.750 versus 0.516, p 
ISSN:1741-7015
1741-7015
DOI:10.1186/s12916-020-01860-y