Shear Performance of Prefabricated Steel Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) Composite Beams under Combined Tensile and Shear Loads: Single Embedded Nut Bolts vs. Studs

Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is widely used in precast concrete-steel composite beams because of its beneficial properties, including reduced structural weight, higher flexural rigidity, and reduced tensile crack formation. In comparison to conventional steel-concrete composite beams, steel-UHPC composite beams exhibit superior characteristics, including reduced structural deadweight, enhanced flexural stiffness, and the capacity to withstand tensile cracking. One successful attempt at meeting the current demands for expedited girder engineering is the development of steel-UHPC composite beams with full-depth precast slabs as key components affecting the overall structural performance using dismountable single embedded nut bolts (SENBs) and widely used studs as competitive alternatives. In contrast, shear connectors are exposed to a combined tensile and shear stress in service life rather than shear only. The corresponding scientific problem is the problem of combined effects under stress in practical applications, but there is currently no relevant research. The shear performance of SENBs in precast steel-UHPC composite beams under tension and shear loads remains unclear. For this purpose, ten push-out specimens and theoretical analyses were performed in this paper, considering the influence of the connector’s type and tensile-to-shear ratio. However, ten specimens were conducted to investigate the tensile-to-shear ratio, and the connector’s type on shear performance is limited. In the future, an increasing number of specimens and test parameters should be considered to investigate the shear performance of precast steel-UHPC composite beams. An increase in the tension-to-shear ratio resulted in a substantial reduction in the ultimate shear capacity, initial shear stiffness, and ductility of the studs. The increase in the tensile-shear ratio from 0 to 0.47 resulted in a 16.9% decline in the ultimate shear capacity, a 30.4% reduction in the initial shear stiffness, and a 21.7% decrease in the ductility of the Series I samples. However, an increase in the tensile-to-shear ratio of the Series II samples from 0 to 0.47 resulted in a 31.3% decline in ultimate shear strength, a 33.2% decline in initial shear stiffness, and a 41.9% decline in ductility. The SENBs demonstrated minimal deviations in ultimate shear capacity compared to their stud counterparts, despite exhibiting notable differences in shear stiffness, and ductility. A lower tensile-to-shea