Comparative Analysis of Genome Editors Efficiency on a Model of Mice Zygotes Microinjection

Genome editing is an indispensable tool for functional genomics. The caveat of the genome-editing pipeline is a prevalence of error-prone non-homologous end joining over homologous recombination, while only the latter is suitable to introduce particularly desired genetic variants. To overcome this p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of molecular sciences 2021-09, Vol.22 (19), p.10221
Hauptverfasser: Averina, Olga A, Permyakov, Oleg A, Grigorieva, Olga O, Starshin, Alexey S, Mazur, Alexander M, Prokhortchouk, Egor B, Dontsova, Olga A, Sergiev, Petr V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Genome editing is an indispensable tool for functional genomics. The caveat of the genome-editing pipeline is a prevalence of error-prone non-homologous end joining over homologous recombination, while only the latter is suitable to introduce particularly desired genetic variants. To overcome this problem, a toolbox of genome engineering was appended by a variety of improved instruments. In this work, we compared the efficiency of a number of recently suggested improved systems for genome editing applied to the same genome regions on a murine zygote model via microinjection. As a result, we observed that homologous recombination utilizing an ssDNA template following sgRNA directed Cas9 cleavage is still the method of choice for the creation of animals with precise genome alterations.
ISSN:1422-0067
1661-6596
1422-0067
DOI:10.3390/ijms221910221