The development of laparoscopic skills using virtual reality simulations: A systematic review

Teaching based on virtual reality simulators in medicine has expanded in recent years due to the limitations of more traditional methods, especially for surgical procedures such as laparoscopy. To analyze the effects of using virtual reality simulations on the development of laparoscopic skills in m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e0252609-e0252609
Hauptverfasser: Taba, João Victor, Cortez, Vitor Santos, Moraes, Walter Augusto, Iuamoto, Leandro Ryuchi, Hsing, Wu Tu, Suzuki, Milena Oliveira, do Nascimento, Fernanda Sayuri, Pipek, Leonardo Zumerkorn, de Mattos, Vitoria Carneiro, D'Albuquerque, Eugênia Carneiro, Carneiro-D'Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto, Meyer, Alberto, Andraus, Wellington
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Teaching based on virtual reality simulators in medicine has expanded in recent years due to the limitations of more traditional methods, especially for surgical procedures such as laparoscopy. To analyze the effects of using virtual reality simulations on the development of laparoscopic skills in medical students and physicians. The literature screening was done in April 2020 through Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Database of the National Institute of Health. In all studies, participants that trained in virtual simulators showed improvements in laparoscopic skills, although the articles that also had a physical model training group did not show better performance of one model compared to the other. Virtual reality simulators are useful educational tools, but do not show proven significant advantages over traditional models. The lack of standardization and a scarcity of articles makes comparative analysis between simulators difficult, requiring more research in the area, according to the model suggested in this review. Registered by the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identification code CRD42020176479.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252609