Il verbo Noein nel fr. 3 DK di Parmenide
In this paper I examine the traditional reading of Parmenides’ fr. B3 (τὸ γὰρ αὐτὸ νοεῖν ἐστίν τε καὶ εἶναι), which implies a strong “identity” between thinking and being, suggesting the hypothesis of a “correspondence” of what is thinkable and what is. These considerations lead me to defend a trans...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Methodos (Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France) France), 2016-01, Vol.16 (16) |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; fre |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper I examine the traditional reading of Parmenides’ fr. B3 (τὸ γὰρ αὐτὸ νοεῖν ἐστίν τε καὶ εἶναι), which implies a strong “identity” between thinking and being, suggesting the hypothesis of a “correspondence” of what is thinkable and what is. These considerations lead me to defend a translation of fr. B3, which seems to me the less anachronistic: “For there is the same thing for being thought and for being”. I discuss in what follows the meaning of the verb νοεῖν and of the connected terms in Parmenides’ Poem (especially in fr. B4). I indicate three interpretative options of νοεῖν: 1. As a form of purely intellectual knowledge of true being (that is, the intelligible); 2. As a form of propositional or “veritative” knowledge concerning the truth or the falsity of a proposition; 3. As a capacity of “catching a situation”, of “recognising” something or someone, suggesting a meaning of being that implies the simple observation of the being of things and of the sensible world. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1626-0600 1769-7379 |
DOI: | 10.4000/methodos.4355 |