Application of computerized virtual preoperative planning procedures in comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures surgery

The treatment of comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures remains challenging due to the difficulty in understanding of fracture patterns and lack of appropriate preoperative planning process. Virtual preoperative planning procedures are now being commonly used in orthopedic surgery to aid in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.51-51, Article 51
Hauptverfasser: Zheng, Yifan, Chen, Jianan, Yang, Siyu, Ke, Xi, Xu, Dan, Wang, Guodong, Cai, Xianhua, Liu, Ximing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The treatment of comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures remains challenging due to the difficulty in understanding of fracture patterns and lack of appropriate preoperative planning process. Virtual preoperative planning procedures are now being commonly used in orthopedic surgery to aid in management of such complex problems. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical value of a new method by applying computerized virtual preoperative planning procedures in the treatment of comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures. A total of 45 patients with comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures from June 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the usage of computerized virtual preoperative planning procedures, they were assigned to group A and group B. In group A (24 patients), the new method was applied before surgery. In group B (21 patients), the conventional surgery was performed without assistance of computerized virtual preoperative planning procedures. The two groups were assessed in terms of blood loss, surgical time, reduction quality, fracture healing time, postoperative complications, and hip function. There were no significant differences in demographic data between the two groups. Patients in group A had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (429.58 vs 570.24 ml, P 
ISSN:1749-799X
1749-799X
DOI:10.1186/s13018-022-02937-5